<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ViewPoint.Orange &#187; experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://viewpointorange.com/tag/experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://viewpointorange.com</link>
	<description>Stumbling upon the intersection between human interactions and emerging technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Forsaking the Future Self</title>
		<link>http://viewpointorange.com/2010/08/forsaking-the-future-self/</link>
		<comments>http://viewpointorange.com/2010/08/forsaking-the-future-self/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuki Chow*</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavior adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewpointorange.com/2010/08/forsaking-the-future-self/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love this following post written by http://www.brasstackthinking.com Tamsen McMahon &#160; Why do we do it? We set goals, we make plans. We tell ourselves we will…this time. But we don’t. A while back, Julien Smith wisely pointed out (as is his &#8230; <a href="http://viewpointorange.com/2010/08/forsaking-the-future-self/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="posterous_autopost">
<p><img src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/temp-2010-08-03/ftkoBtlyeJkmhrCihAyanGpbkzpaeflkhdlbBlvhbFojgvvjkhpbkkanbFur/Forsake_self.jpg.scaled500.jpg" alt="" width="488" height="394" /></p>
<p><em><span style="font-size: small;">Love this following post written by <a href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com">http://www.brasstackthinking.com</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.brasstackthinking.com/author/tamsen/">Tamsen McMahon</a></span></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">Wh</span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">y do we do it? We set goals, we make plans. We tell ourselves we </span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><em><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">will</span></em></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">…this time.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">But we don’t.</span></strong><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">A while back, Julien Smith wisely pointed out (as is his wont) that <a title="Past me and Future me - inoveryourhead.net" href="http://inoveryourhead.net/past-me-and-future-me/" target="_blank">three of us are present for any decision</a>: there’s who we were, who we are, and who we are going to be. One begets another.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">As I said to Julien then, each has a siren song: Past Self dwells in what could have been, Present Self dwells in the lush tactility of now, and Future Self sees all that could yet still be. Each has lessons: Past makes us what we are, Present sets who we’ll be, and Future reveals the paths from which we choose.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">Future Self fascinates me. It holds so much promise, and yet we forsake it all the time—<strong><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">we do things today that pretty much screw over the person we’ll be tomorrow</span></strong>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">Why is that?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">Perhaps because it’s so easy to dwell in the past. We know Past Self—it’s as old as we are, minus a day. It walks with us in everything we do, chats with us, tells us how this is or isn’t like what came before, how we have or haven’t succeeded by doing this or that. Perhaps it’s because some of us don’t like our Present Selves very much, and we can’t see the possibilities that Future Self provides, or at least, we can’t see anything but a continuation of who we are right now (and that’s more than we can bear).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">Or maybe it’s just that the devil we know is better than the devil we don’t.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">I mean, Future Self…we don’t even <em><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">know</span></em> that guy. He just sits out there, dealing in abstraction, putting pressure on Present Self, waiting to see what we’re going to do to him. Bastard.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">As much as I love to ask “why?” (and trust me, I can be worse than a toddler on that front), the answers fall too often into the True But Useless category of information. <strong><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">What good is understanding “why” if it doesn’t actually move us to do something different? </span></strong>(Or worse, actually holds us back?)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">Not much.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">The problem is our success <em>depends</em> on our relationship with our Future Self</span></strong><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">—on someone we <em><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">can’t</span></em> know, and yet whose life we control absolutely.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;">So, how do we do that? How do you? </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Image credit <a title="Link to antonkawasaki's photostream" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/antonkawasaki/">antonkawasaki</a></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;"><br />
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a> from <a href="http://sn0wfl8ke.posterous.com/forsaking-the-future-self">sn0wfl8ke&#8217;s Muse</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://viewpointorange.com/2010/08/forsaking-the-future-self/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eyetrack reVeals search is gOing sOcial, sO what?</title>
		<link>http://viewpointorange.com/2009/08/eyetrack-reveals-search-is-going-social-so-what/</link>
		<comments>http://viewpointorange.com/2009/08/eyetrack-reveals-search-is-going-social-so-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuki Chow*</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewpointorange.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do people actually look at ads on social media sites? Marketers face the constant challenge of keeping up with and understanding consumer search behavior. Social networking sites offer opportunities to develop a relationship between brands and consumers, display ads and &#8230; <a href="http://viewpointorange.com/2009/08/eyetrack-reveals-search-is-going-social-so-what/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Do people actually look at ads on social media sites?</em> Marketers face the constant challenge of keeping up with and understanding consumer search behavior. Social networking sites offer opportunities to develop a relationship between brands and consumers, display ads and search. But a lot of confusion over the effectiveness of advertising on social networking sites still exists. An eye tracking study conducted on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, Twitter and YouTube by a <a href="http://www.oneupweb.com/" target="_blank">digital marketing company</a> reveals trends about the way people interact with paid ads in social media sites. The study hopes to alleviate some of the mystery.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oneupweb.com/" target="_blank">Oneupweb</a> found that not only do people spend time viewing paid ads on social networks, but they often looked at the ads more quickly once they landed on the search results page. For example, <strong>65% of participants engage with sponsored ads within the first 10 seconds of their search</strong>. Often times, the path eyes scan the page often does not follow the order of the search results. <strong>Contrary to expected behavior, sponsored ads were looked at before the 3rd or 4th result</strong>. The Oneupweb study indicates similar behavior was observed throughout the YouTube search. The participants engaged with the sponsored ads in the process of completing the search task. Twitter does not support sponsored ads but the study still observed users&#8217; search habits on Twitter as it has become an essential social marketing channel. About half of survey participants revealed they were satisfied with their brand search on Twitter. <strong>Many liked that they could find the most current opinions about a product</strong>. If you would like a PDF copy of the study results, access it <a href="http://www.oneupweb.com/pdf/oneupweb_eye_tracking_study_2009.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>!</p>
<p>Okay, we&#8217;ve established that <strong>there&#8217;s not blindness toward ads in social networks, people still look at the ads.</strong> But do they click on them? Unlike searching on Google, <strong>the interaction with content in social media sites is very different</strong>. <span>Many marketers including myself believe that <strong>opt-in advertising works best, while behavior-based campaigns and randomly generated ads are far less successful</strong>. </span>In my opinion, this notion still holds true although the end users are becoming more acceptable of sponsored ads on social sites. <strong>Niche targeting</strong> and <strong>relevancy</strong> are the two areas advertisers need to focus on more when they try to apply their brand campaigns to those new environments. <strong>Will targeting based on niche, geographic location, interest, lifestyle &amp; social graph be the future of advertising? Certainly! Will &#8220;<a title="engagement ads" href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2008/10/30/facebook-advertising-resources-the-6-types-of-ads-on-the-new-home-page/" target="_blank">engagement ads</a>&#8221; change the game of online advertising after Google&#8217;s creation of &#8220;<a title="contexual ads" href="http://www.urlesque.com/2009/08/28/10-awesome-contextual-ad-fails-photos/" target="_blank">contextual ads</a>&#8221; (judge the quality yourself)? Sooner or later. As of now, there is still a lot left to be desired!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://viewpointorange.com/2009/08/eyetrack-reveals-search-is-going-social-so-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time is up! Agency model is broken!</title>
		<link>http://viewpointorange.com/2009/05/time-is-up-influence-behavior-change-minds-now/</link>
		<comments>http://viewpointorange.com/2009/05/time-is-up-influence-behavior-change-minds-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 23:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yuki Chow*</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavior adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewpointorange.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Future of Advertising. WTF? View more documents from David Armano.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="width:425px;text-align:left" id="__ss_1344357"><a style="font:14px Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif;display:block;margin:12px 0 3px 0;text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/darmano/the-future-of-advertising-wtf" title="The Future of Advertising. WTF?">The Future of Advertising. WTF?</a><object style="margin:0px" width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=foa-090426140329-phpapp01&#038;stripped_title=the-future-of-advertising-wtf" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=foa-090426140329-phpapp01&#038;stripped_title=the-future-of-advertising-wtf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
<div style="font-size:11px;font-family:tahoma,arial;height:26px;padding-top:2px;">View more <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/">documents</a> from <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/darmano">David Armano</a>.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://viewpointorange.com/2009/05/time-is-up-influence-behavior-change-minds-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

